Here's the problem.
She doesn't address WHY feminists are called baby-haters.
Few people hate babies once they're out of the womb.
But Prole thinks it's perfectly okay to kill them inside the womb.
She thinks doing this to a baby is okay:
She may even think doing it to a later-term baby is okay, too, like what happened to this unlucky baby:
She probably has a peculiar definition of "hate" that excludes the notion of killing innocent babies.
That's probably why she objects to being called a "baby-hater".
As long as the baby is in the womb, there can be no hate, to a feminist. There's nobody to hate! How can you hate, if you're supposed to feel nothing at all? It's just a blob. It's just an appendage attached to the woman.
It's hard for feminists to address the charge of "baby-hating" if they don't admit that there is, actually, a baby in the womb, in the first place-- the actual source of the charge.
When they stop their prejudicial thinking towards the unborn and admit that the being inside a pregnant woman is, actually, a baby, that will be a start. Even Henry Morgentaler says it's a baby after 24 weeks, and wouldn't perform an abortion on one.
But the fact of the matter is, they sanction killing babies. There's no two ways about it.
For more social conservative news check out BigBlueWave.ca
